The SCORE Act Is Unconstitutional: Private Nondelegation Problems with Congress’s Latest Attempt to Regulate College Sports

Ehrlich, Sam C. & Rodenberg, Ryan M.

Journal: Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Volume: 2025

First Page: 121

Year: 2025

Bluebook Citation: 2025 CARDOZO L. REV. DE NOVO 121 (2025)

Author: Sam C. Ehrlich: all 11 publications


Abstract

The Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements Act (“SCORE Act”) is Congress’s most ambitious effort yet to bring stability to college sports, codifying the recent House settlement while granting sweeping regulatory power to private athletic associations such as the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) and the College Sports Commission (“CSC”). However, by delegating policymaking authority to these private, self-interested entities without any sort of public oversight, the bill raises serious constitutional concerns under the private nondelegation doctrine. Drawing on parallels to a string of litigation involving the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Act (“HISA”) and recent Supreme Court signals, this Article argues that it may not matter whether the SCORE Act can be passed, because its structure cannot withstand constitutional scrutiny.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.