The Scope of the Residual Hearsay Exceptions in the Federal Rules of Evidence

Imwinkelried, Edward J.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 15

First Page: 239

Year: 1978

Bluebook Citation: 15 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 239 (1978)

Author: Edward J. Imwinkelried: all 86 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1985State v. Smith N.C.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This article discusses the residual hearsay exceptions contained in the Federal Rules of Evidence, which permit a judge to admit trustworthy hearsay even if the declaration does not fall within a specific exception. The author begins by summarizing the common law view of the trial judge's power to recognize new hearsay exceptions. Next, the author traces the legislative history of the residual exceptions. The author then analyzes the decided cases construing the exceptions.

Finally, the author examines the question whether the courts should limit the residual exception rules to hearsay statements with extraordinary probative value. The author argues that sound statutory construction would not support courts being limited to using the residual exception rules only for hearsay statements with extraordinary probative value.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.