The "Same Criminal Conduct" Exception of the Washington Sentencing Reform Act: Making the Punishment Fit the Crimes—State v. Collicott, 112 Wash. 2d 399, 771 P.2d 1137 (1989)

Bennett, Joseph P.

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 65

First Page: 397

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 65 WASH. L. REV. 397 (1990)

Author: Joseph P. Bennett: all 2 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
4
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

3
1
1990s2000s

Courts citing this journal article

Wash.3
Wash. Ct. App.1
Most recently cited by4

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Under the Washington Sentencing Reform Act (SRA), two or more offenses committed in one transaction count as criminal history for the purpose of enhancing the sentence for each offense, unless the offenses encompass the "same criminal conduct." In State v. Collicott, the Washington Supreme Court held that offenses that share statutory elements constitute the same criminal conduct. The court's previous approach in State v. Dunaway focused on whether one crime furthered another. Analysis demonstrates that Dunaway better provides for proportionate sentences, and coupled with the merger doctrine, adequately prevents double punishment. Thus, the Washington Legislature should amend the SRA to codify the Dunaway approach.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.