The Sabbatino Case and the Sabbatino Amendment: Comedy--or Tragedy--of Errors

Reeves, William H.

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 20

First Page: 429

Year: 1967

Bluebook Citation: 20 VAND. L. REV. 429 (1967)

Author: William Harvey Reeves: all 11 publications


Abstract

The issues and decisions in the Sabbatino litigation and the significant concepts of the Sabbatino legislation are here reviewed and considered in five parts. Part I discusses the mistaken beliefs of the Congress as to the reasons for proposing and enacting the Sabbatino Amendment. Part II then examines the relations between Cuba and the United States, explaining how Cuba's insult made possible the judicial errors in the Sabbatino decisions, which were reversed by the Supreme Court, and also prompted the subsequent Sabbatino legislation. In Part III, proof will be given of congressional misinterpretations of foreign law and foreign court decisions in considering and passing the Sabbatino Amendment.

Part IV will then present some unanswered questions with respect to the Sabbatino Amendment's relation to the Constitution of the United States. Finally, Part V will offer a better method for accomplishing the desired results.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.