The Role of Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance in Securities Fraud Class Action Settlements

Donelson, Dain C., Hopkins, Justin J. & Yust, Christopher G.

Journal: Journal of Law and Economics

Volume: 58

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 58 J. L. & ECON. (2015)

Author: Justin J. Hopkins: all 1 publication


Abstract

Because of previous data unavailability, it is unclear how important directors’ and officers’ (D&O) insurance is in securities fraud class action settlements. Using a unique data set of US D&O policies, we find that D&O insurance coverage is a less significant determinant of settlement amounts than estimated damages and proxies for the merits of cases. Limits on D&O insurance are related to settlements in only the weakest cases (those without allegations of accounting violations or institutional lead plaintiffs) where proxies for cases’ merits play a minimal role. Our findings suggest that most securities fraud class action settlements are meritorious and that accounting-related cases are a reasonable proxy for fraud.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.