The Road to <i>Bush v. Gore</i>: The History of the Supreme Court's Use of the Per Curiam Opinion

Ray, Laura K.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 79

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 79 NEB. L. REV. (2000)

Author: Laura Krugman Ray: all 15 publications


Abstract

I. Introduction II. The History of the Per Curiam Opinion as a Form of Judicial Expression ... A. The Background: An Instrument of Consensus ... B. The Transformation: The Decline of Consensus III. The Per Curiam and the Idea of Individualism ... A. The Emergence of the Separate Voice ... B. The Pursuit of Consensus IV. The Per Curiam as a Strategic Device ... A. Achieving Efficiency ... B. Working by Indirection ... C. Creating New Law ... D. Using Procedure as a Screen ... E. Disciplining Courts and Litigants V. The Per Curiam and Individual Expression ... A. The Minimalist Opinion and Efficiency: New York Times Co. v. United States ... B. The Minimalist Opinion and Personal Liberation: Furman v. Georgia ... C. Collaboration and the Broader Vision: Buckley v. Valeo VI. The Per Curiam and the Rehnquist Court ... A. The Prologue: A Limited Role ... B. Bush v. Gore: The Return to Center Stage VII. Conclusion

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.