The "Reception" of Defamation By the Common Law

Lovell, Colin R.

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 15

First Page: 1051

Year: 1962

Bluebook Citation: 15 VAND. L. REV. 1051 (1962)

Author: Colin R. Lovell: all 1 publication


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Courts citing this journal article

Ill.1
S.C. Ct. App.1
Most recently cited by2

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

The rather low opinion held by Mr. Bumble concerning the logic of the law must be set off by the Holmesian reminder that not "logic," but"experience" has kept the law viable. The warning has peculiar applicability in looking at the common law doctrines on defamation. Only the experience of history can explain why, in contrast to Roman civil law systems with their view that all defamations and insults are injuriae, with a single remedial action, the common law has no interest in mere bad language' and goes on to have two separate actions for defamation. Moreover, these are quite artificially distinguished by the form of the defamation, with each action having different definitions, requirements, and defences,the result being that occasionally the mere form determines whether the common law will give any relief for a defamatory statement.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.