The Questionable Case for Using Auctions to Select Lead Counsel

Bebchuk, Lucian Arye

Journal: Washington University Law Review

Volume: 80

First Page: 889

Year: 2002

Bluebook Citation: 80 WASH. U. L. REV. 889 (2002)

Author: Lucian Arye Bebchuk: all 31 publications


Abstract

This Article analyzes the shortcomings of using auctions for selecting lead counsel in class action cases. In contrast to what proponents of auctions suggest, the outcome of an auction is likely to divergeconsiderably from what an informed principal would have chosen. In particular, auctions push the percentage of recovery paid to counsel to thelowest level at which law firms would be willing to take the case. Because of the need to provide counsel with incentives to invest effort andresources, however, the class might well be better served by a higher percentage than this minimum level, and auctions might push fees to levels that are too low.

The analyzed problems are ones that arise also in those types of cases for which the use of auctions should be considered according to the recent recommendations of a Task Force report.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.