The Public and Private Faces of Derivative Lawsuits

Thompson, Robert B. & Thomas, Randall S.

Journal: Vanderbilt Law Review

Volume: 57

First Page: 1747

Year: 2004

Bluebook Citation: 57 VAND. L. REV. 1747 (2004)

Author: Robert B. Thompson: all 40 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2015NAF Holdings, LLC v. Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd. Del.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Are shareholder derivative suits at death's door? Once described as "the most important procedure the law has yet developed to police the internal affairs of corporations,"' derivative suits are today regularly portrayed as nuisance suits whose "principal beneficiaries ... are attorneys." Even if these critics are wrong, there may now be less need for derivative suits, as other forms of representative suits have grown up that do much of their work. Federal securities fraud class actions increasingly address legal claims that raise issues about management care, and fiduciary duty class actions under state law are the principal litigation vehicle to remedy management misconduct in merger and acquisition settings. At the same time, American stock exchanges now require more independent directors for larger public companies, a change that will make it more difficult for derivative suits to survive procedural challenges under existing legal rules.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.