The Psychotherapist's Duty to Protect the Public: The Appropriate Standard and the Foundation in Legal Theory and Empirical Premises

Schopp, Robert F.

Journal: Nebraska Law Review

Volume: 70

Year: 1991

Bluebook Citation: 70 NEB. L. REV. (1991)

Author: Robert F. Schopp: all 7 publications


Abstract

I. Introduction II. Schuster and Hamman ... A. Schuster v. Altenberg ... B. Hamman v. County of Maricopa ... C. The Common Foundation of Schuster and Hamman III. Previous Cases ... A. STIV [specific threats toward identifiable victims] Cases ... B. ZOD [zone of danger] Cases ... C. Comparison of STIV Cases with Earlier ZOD Cases IV. Analysis ... A. The Duty to Protect and the Duty to Warn ... B. Determined or Should Have Determined ... C. The ZOD Standard as Self-Defeating V. Summary and Conclusions

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.