The Professional Obligation to Raise Frivolous Issues in Death Penalty Cases

Freedman, Monroe H.

Journal: Hofstra Law Review

Volume: 31

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 31 HOFSTRA L. REV. (2003)

Author: Monroe H. Freedman: all 37 publications


Abstract

Lawyers are generally familiar with the ethical rule forbidding frivolous arguments, principally because of sanctions imposed under rules of civil procedure for making such arguments. Not all lawyers are aware, however, of two ways in which the prohibitions of frivolous arguments are restricted in both the rules themselves and in their enforcement. First, the ethical rules have express limitations with respect to arguments made on behalf of criminal defendants, and courts are generally loath to sanction criminal defense lawyers. Second, the term "frivolous" is narrowed, even in civil cases, by the way it is defined and explained in the ethical rules and in court decisions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.