The Problems with Setoff: A Proposed Legislative Solution

Sepinuck, Stephen L.

Journal: William & Mary Law Review

Volume: 30

First Page: 51

Year: 1988

Bluebook Citation: 30 WM. & MARY L. REV. 51 (1988)

Author: Stephen L. Sepinuck: all 4 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1990s2010s

Courts citing this journal article

M.D. Fla.1
Neb.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2013Brook v. Chase Bank (USA), N.A. (In re Acosta-Garriga) M.D. Fla.
  • 1995Davis Erection Co. v. Jorgensen Neb.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Article explores the current status of the law of setoff in this country. It first briefly examines the history of setoff, details where and when it arises, and explains its importance. The Article then illustrates the different ways in which states have approached some of the complex issues presented by setoff and determines which approaches appear best. Finally, presuming the need for increased uniformity, the Article proposes a draft Uniform Setoff Act and an "Official Comment" thereto.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.