The Problematic Provision and Protection of Health and Welfare Benefits for Retirees
Weckstein, Donald T.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Most recently cited by1
- 2003Poole v. City of Waterbury Conn.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
This Article explores the conceptual underpinnings of the law governing health and welfare benefits of retired employees. The author begins by discussing bargaining rights and duties and examining the legal consequences of an employer modification of bargained-for retiree benefits. The author argues that there is no legal prohibition on modification or termination without proof of a contractual commitment that gives the retiree a vested right to benefits. The author concludes that, until Congress changes the law, a presumption against contractual vesting of retiree benefits should be applied and extrinsic evidence should be admitted to rebut this presumption.