The Paradox of Source Code Secrecy

Katyal, Sonia K.

Journal: Cornell Law Review

Volume: 104

First Page: 1183

Year: 2019

Bluebook Citation: 104 CORNELL L. REV. 1183 (2019)

Author: Sonia K. Katyal: all 21 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2020Thales Visionix, Inc. v. United States Fed. Cl.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In Lear v. Adkins, the Supreme Court precipitously wrote, "federal law requires that all ideas in general circulation be dedicated to the common good unless they are protected by a valid patent." Today, it is clear that trade secrecy's dominance over source code has been a significant cause for concern in cases involving the public interest. To protect civil rights in the age of automated decision making, I argue, we must limit opportunities for seclusion in areas of intellectual property, criminal justice, and governance more generally. The solution, therefore, does not require a complete overhaul of the existing system, but rather a more nuanced, granular approach that seeks to balance the interest of disclosure and public access with the substantial values of protection, privacy, and property.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.