The Next Step After <i>Daubert</i>: Developing a Similarly Epistemological Approach to Ensuring the Reliability of Nonscientific Expert Testimony
Imwinkelried, Edward J.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
6
Citing decisions
5
Courts citing
Citations by decade
2
3
1
1990s2000s2010s
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by6
- 2013Frances G. Rodgers v. John Adam Noll, III Tenn. Ct. App.
- 2008In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (" Mtbe") Prod. S.D.N.Y.
- 2008County of Suffolk v. Amerada Hess Corp. S.D.N.Y.
- 2005Marron v. Stromstad Alaska
- 1997United States v. Jones 6th Cir.
- 1997Moore v. Ashland Chemical, Inc. 5th Cir.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
On June 28, 1993, after much fanfare, the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The decision was not only preceded by intense media attention; the decision was also immediately followed by a massive-and growing-volume of commentary. As is usually true with landmark decisions, it is imperative to identify what the Court decided and what the Court left unresolved.