The Meaning of <i>Daubert</i> and What That Means for Forensic Science

Jonakait, Randolph N.

Journal: Cardozo Law Review

Volume: 15

First Page: 2103

Year: 1994

Bluebook Citation: 15 CARDOZO L. REV. 2103 (1994)

Author: Randolph N. Jonakait: all 21 publications


Abstract

Daubert's effect on forensic science is unclear because the opinion is unclear. The Daubert Court did start blazing a useful path by stating that before scientific testimony is admitted, the trial court must be convinced that "the reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony is scientifically valid and ... that [the] reasoning or methodology properly can be applied to the facts in issue." But the Court's trailblazing was incomplete and often misleading.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.