The Legal Structure of American Freedom and the Provenance of the Antitrust Immunities

Sagers, Christopher L.

Journal: Utah Law Review

Volume: 2002

Year: 2002

Bluebook Citation: 2002 UTAH L. REV. (2002)

Author: Christopher L. Sagers: all 7 publications


Abstract

In sum, a variety of odd and dramatic consequences counsel that the constitutional explanation should be abandoned. There exists already an extensive body of law to deal with the problem of legal retaliation against political conduct-namely, Speech Clause jurisprudence-which is designed to accommodate the fact-rich, policy-laden, and inherently subjective contexts in which such matters inevitably arise. Indeed, the constitutional explanation really has nothing going for it but good intentions, and ranged against it are all sorts of problems. Therefore, I think the petitioning immunity should be recognized for what it is: an interpretation of a peculiar and uncommonly vague body of federal statutes that by their nature require a lot of interpretation.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.