The Last Promissory Estoppel Article

Feinman, Jay M.

Journal: Fordham Law Review

Volume: 61

First Page: 303

Year: 1992

Bluebook Citation: 61 FORDHAM L. REV. 303 (1992)

Author: Jay M. Feinman: all 27 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1994Owasso Development Co. v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. Kan. Ct. App.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In this essay, Professor Feinman argues that the doctrine of promissory estoppel has outlived its usefulness as a theory of contract Professor Feinman relies on an article written by Professors Edward Yorio and Steven Thel as an illustration of the debate over whether promissory estoppel is based upon the enforcement of promises or the protection of reliance. Professor Feinman rejects the conceptual framework upon which this debate is based and ultimately proposes that contract law should move to a relational analysis, ignoring the distinction between promise and reliance and replacing it with an analysis of the obligations involved in a particular relationship.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.