The Last Minuet: Disparate Treatment After <em>Hicks</em>
Malamud, Deborah C.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
7
Citing decisions
6+
Courts citing
Citations by decade
5
1
1
1990s2000s2020s
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by7
- 2020Comcast Corp. v. Nat'l Ass'n of African American-Owned Media U.S.
- 2000Dominguez Cruz v. Suttle Caribe, Inc. 1st Cir.
- 1997Aka v. Washington Hospital Center D.C. Cir.
- 1997Nieto v. L&H Packing Co. 5th Cir.
- 1997Brodsky v. Hercules, Inc. D. Del.
- 1996Bartlik v. United States Department of Labor 6th Cir.
- 1996Sheridan v. EI DuPont de Nemours 3rd Cir.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explain why the Court's much-maligned decision in Hicks was correct, and to further argue that in the aftermath of Hicks, the McDonnell Douglas-Burdine proof structure ought to be abandoned.