The Jurisprudence of Skepticism

Posner, Richard A.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 86

First Page: 827

Year: 1988

Bluebook Citation: 86 MICH. L. REV. 827 (1988)

Author: Richard A. Posner: all 194 publications


Abstract

The skeptical vein in American thinking about law runs from Holmes to the legal realists to the critical legal studies movement, while behind Holmes stretches a European skeptical legal tradition that runs from Thrasymachus (in Plato's Republic) to Hobbes and Bentham and beyond. Against the skeptics can be arrayed a vast number of natural lawyers, legal conventionalists, and formalists, including Cicero, Coke, Blackstone, and Langdell, not to mention the majority of contemporary lawyers, judges, and law professors. This article will set forth and defend a moderately skeptical approach to law and judging, one not so far-reaching as that of the critical legal studies movement or even of Holmes but distinct from orthodox legal thought or at least its pietistic expressions.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.