The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Law: The Philosophical Origins and Differences Between the Western Liberal and Soviet Communist State Law

Motala, Ziyad

Journal: Penn State International Law Review

Volume: 8

First Page: 225

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 8 PENN ST. INT'L L. REV. 225 (1990)

Author: Ziyad Motala: all 4 publications


Abstract

This article will examine the philosophical notions of a constitution and a state system from a historical perspective. It will highlight the different philosophical bases of state law and the purpose the constitution is meant to serve under the two divergent orders. The approach will be descriptive and comparative. The purpose of this work is not (in the words of Christopher Osakwe) to pass off a political opinion about the desirability of one or the other legal systems.

Instead, the essential focus will be to examine the jurisprudence underlying the constitutional systems, and the different uses that constitutions perform in the two orders. In a sense, the study proceeds from a level of abstraction.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.