The Inadequacy of Judicial Remedies in Cases of Exclusionary Zoning
Michigan Law Review
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
This Note presents and evaluates the possible judicial responses to cases, like Mount Laurel, that involve challenges to entire zoning ordinances on exclusionary grounds. It argues that pragmatic and legal difficulties militate against any judicial imposition of affirmative relief not tailored to specific tracts of land and suggests that the most effective resolution of the problems confronted by low-income housing advocates lies in comprehensive legislative programs.