The Historical Origins of the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination at Common Law

Langbein, John H.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 92

First Page: 1047

Year: 1994

Bluebook Citation: 92 MICH. L. REV. 1047 (1994)

Author: John H. Langbein: all 32 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
3
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
2
2010s2020s

Courts citing this journal article

6th Cir.1
Ga.1
Wis.1
Most recently cited by3
  • 2023State v. Tomas Jaymitchell Hoyle Wis.
  • 2022Leanne Walters v. Richard Snyder 6th Cir.
  • 2019Elliott v. State Ga.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This essay explains that the true origins of the common law privilege are to be found not in the high politics of the English revolutions, but in the rise of adversary criminal procedure at the end of the eighteenth century. The privilege against self-incrimination at common law was the work of defense counsel. Part I of this essay discusses the several attributes of early modem criminal procedure that combined, until the end of the eighteenth century, to prevent the development of the common law privilege. Part II explains how prior scholarship went astray in locating the common law privilege against self-incrimination in the wrong events and in the wrong century.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.