The Fruits of the Convoluted Road to Patent Reform: The New Invalidity Proceedings of the Patent and Trademark Office

Jeffrey Kushan

Journal: Yale Law & Policy Review

Volume: 30

First Page: 385

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 30 YALE L. & POL'Y REV. 385 (2015)

Author: Jeffrey P. Kushan: all 3 publications


Abstract

The patent system, by its very nature, prompts debates over the proper balance of freedoms and restrictions with respect to the use of new technology. On the one hand, in industries where competitive pressures force companies to launch new and improved products on a twelve-year, six-year, or even faster cycle, twenty-year patent exclusivity can seem perhaps an anachronism, especially when it takes three to five years to secure rights. On the other hand, patent exclusivity is crucially important for certain products-namely, those requiring tremendous up-front investments and years of effort to develop and launch, but which are easy and inexpensive to copy. For more than 220 years, Congress has tilted in favor of retaining the patent system, with its simple principle that a grant of exclusive rights over an invention best serves the public interest of promoting the "[pirogress of [s]cience and useful [a]rts."

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.