The Fourth Amendment as a Device for Protecting the Innocent
Loewy, Arnold H.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
4
Citing decisions
4
Courts citing
Citations by decade
3
1
1980s2010s
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by4
- 2015State v. Skok - Concurrence Conn.
- 1987Commonwealth v. Blood Mass.
- 1986State v. Boyce Wash. Ct. App.
- 1984United States v. Jacobsen U.S.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Part I of this Article establishes that the government has a right to search for and seize evidence of crime. Part II develops the corollary proposition that the fourth amendment does not protect the right to secrete evidence of crime. Part III explores the impact of the reasonable expectation of privacy concept on the innocent. Part IV evaluates consent searches and their effect on the innocent.
Finally, Part V considers the exclusionary rule as a device for protecting the innocent.