The Fixation Thesis: The Role of Historical Fact in Original Meaning

Solum, Lawrence B

Journal: Notre Dame Law Review

Volume: 91

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 91 NOTRE DAME L. REV. (2015)

Author: Lawrence B. Solum: all 45 publications


Abstract

Part I begins by examining the role of the Fixation Thesis in contemporary originalist constitutional theory. The next step, in Part II, is to state the affirmative case for the Fixation Thesis. This is the heart of this Article and readers who are looking for the gist might limit themselves to the discussion here. Part III explores a variety of objections to the Fixation Thesis and clarifies the content of the thesis in light of the answers to these objections.

Several theoretical views that reject (or seem to reject) the Fixation Thesis are examined in Part IV. Part V applies the Fixation Thesis to three examples, “domestic violence,” “cruel and unusual punishment,” and “privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” The conclusion assesses the landscape of constitutional theory in light of the arguments presented.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.