The First Amendment Doctrine of Underbreadth

Lee, William E.

Journal: Washington University Law Review

Volume: 71

First Page: 637

Year: 1993

Bluebook Citation: 71 WASH. U. L. REV. 637 (1993)

Author: William E. Lee: all 15 publications


Abstract

This Article explains why the Supreme Court approaches differential treatment in such diverse ways. Because the topic of differential treatment of categories of expression has been explored elsewhere, this Article primarily focuses on differential treatment of communicators. In addition, because the press is frequently singled out for special treatment, the author discusses the question whether the press should be regarded as special. This Article argues that there are powerful reasons for preventing the government from discriminating among members of the press.

These reasons also require that the government not discriminate between the press and nonpress communicators.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.