The Exercise of Administrative Discretion under the Immigration Laws

Roberts, Maurice A.

Journal: San Diego Law Review

Volume: 13

First Page: 144

Year: 1975

Bluebook Citation: 13 SAN DIEGO L. REV. 144 (1975)

Author: Maurice A. Roberts: all 6 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1970s2000s

Courts citing this journal article

BIA1
E.D.N.Y.1
Most recently cited by2
  • 2005United States v. Copeland E.D.N.Y.
  • 1974BLAS BIA

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Article examines the exercise of administrative discretion under the immigration laws under practical considerations. In terms of human misery, the potential impact of our immigration laws can hardly be overstated. With minor exceptions, the immigration laws operate directly and exclusively upon human beings whose hopes for future happiness in a realistic sense frequently depend on their ability to enter, or remain in, this land of freedom and opportunity. The statutes themselves contain a built-in potential for hardship which is to some extent unavoidable.

To afford some opportunity for relief from the hardships that inevitably result from the application of laws thus cast in inflexible terms, Congress has through the years provided an ever-increasing array of administrative remedies. The Author argues that unless standards are laid down which are not illusory and can be uniformly applied in the real world, we depart from evenhanded justice and the rule of law.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.