The Ethics of Advocacy for the Mentally Ill: Philosophic and Ethnographic Considerations

Arrigo, Bruce A. & Williams, Christopher R.

Journal: Seattle University Law Review

Volume: 24

First Page: 245

Year: 2000

Bluebook Citation: 24 SEATTLE U. L. REV. 245 (2000)

Author: Christopher R. Williams: all 1 publication


Abstract

In this Article, we critically address several philosophical underpinnings of ethical decision-making that impact persons with psychiatric disorders. We focus our attention, however, upon an admittedly limited target area. Thus, we canvass a select number of significant issues that pose unique problems for humanity. The purpose of these excursions is that of reflection.

In brief, we will speculatively examine: (1) the relationship between human rights and the law; (2) the relationship between mental illness and the law (i.e. the rights of the mentally ill); (3) the ethics of involuntary confinement (i.e., taking away and giving back rights to the mentally ill); (4) the ethics of advocating for the rights of the mentally ill; and (5) the philosophical limits of ethical (mental health) advocacy.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.