The Emergency Exception to the Fourth Amendment

Bacigal, Ronald J.

Journal: University of Richmond Law Review

Volume: 9

First Page: 249

Year: 1975

Bluebook Citation: 9 U. RICH. L. REV. 249 (1975)

Author: Ronald J. Bacigal: all 24 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
3
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
1
1
1970s1980s1990s

Courts citing this journal article

Ill. App. Ct.1
Mass. App. Ct.1
Md.1
Most recently cited by3
  • 1990Commonwealth v. Bates Mass. App. Ct.
  • 1981People v. Meddows Ill. App. Ct.
  • 1978Lebedun v. State Md.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Although an emergency or exigent circumstance is frequently cited as one justification for a search without a warrant,' "the contours of this exception have not developed and. . . [the Supreme Court] .. .has never pinned it down to a workable and effective meaning. Some of the ambiguity surrounding the emergency exception is attributable to the use of the single term "emergency" to embody several distinct concepts. An emergency can be defined broadly as the basic justification for all warrantless searches, or it may refer to a single type of warrantless search separate and distinct from other recognized warrantless searches. Even the latter concept of "emergency" leads to confusion because it ignores the courts' de facto distinction between emergencies involving a potential loss of life (emergency intrusions), and emergencies involving a potential loss of evidence (emergency searches).

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.