The Effects of Alice on Covered Business Method (CBM) Reviews

Schecter, Manny, Ambwani, Shawn, Shei, Alexander & Jain, Robert

Journal: Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property

Volume: 14

First Page: 381

Year: 2017

Bluebook Citation: 14 NW. J. TECH. & INTELL. PROP. 381 (2017)

Author: Robert Jain: all 1 publication


Abstract

The frequency of § 101 challenges in Covered Business Method (CBM) filings has undoubtedly increased after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int’l, 134 S.Ct. 2347 (2014). It is uncertain, however, whether this shift in petitioners’ preferences will lead to more favorable outcomes from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) post-Alice.

This study analyzes CBM outcomes at both the institution and final decision stages by ground to provide an empirical perspective on Alice’s impact that can benefit practitioners, policymakers, patentees, and petitioners alike.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.