The Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Washington

Kaminoff, Max

Journal: Washington Law Review

Volume: 13

First Page: 215

Year: 1938

Bluebook Citation: 13 WASH. L. REV. 215 (1938)

Author: Max Kaminoff: all 4 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
8
Citing decisions
1
Courts citing

Citations by decade

5
2
1
1940s1950s1970s
Most recently cited by8
  • 1971Zukowsky v. Brown Wash.
  • 1959Chase v. Beard Wash.
  • 1952Nopson v. Wockner Wash.
  • 1949Nopson v. City of Seattle Wash.
  • 1948Morner v. Union Pacific Railroad Wash.
  • 1947Gardner v. Seymour Wash.
  • 1946Pacific Coast R. R. v. American Mail Line, Ltd. Wash.
  • 1942Hardman v. Younkers Wash.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, where proof is made that an injury occurred under certain circumstances, negligence will be presumed from those circumstances. It is the purpose of this comment to discuss the doctrine as it exists in Washington from the standpoint of: (1) Under what circumstances will the doctrine be applied; (2) What effect will be given to the doctrine when it is applied; and (3) Will the applicability of the doctrine be affected by the plaintiff's pleading and attempting to prove specific acts of negligence.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.