The Divergence of Standards of Conduct and Standards of Review in Corporate Law

Eisenberg, Melvin Aron

Journal: Fordham Law Review

Volume: 62

First Page: 437

Year: 1993

Bluebook Citation: 62 FORDHAM L. REV. 437 (1993)

Author: Melvin Aron Eisenberg: all 33 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
9
Citing decisions
3
Courts citing

Citations by decade

1
3
5
2000s2010s2020s

Courts citing this journal article

Del. Ch.7
Del.1
N.C. Bus. Ct.1
Most recently cited by9
  • 2026Arxada Holdings NA Inc. v. Harvey Del. Ch.
  • 2026Young Women's Christian Association of Rochester & Monroe County v. Hatteras Funds, LP Del. Ch.
  • 2025Leo Investments Hong Kong Limited v. Tomales Bay Capital Anduril III, L.P. Del. Ch.
  • 2024McRitchie v. Zuckerberg Del. Ch.
  • 2022Metro Storage International LLC v. Harron Del. Ch.
  • 2019Glidepath Limited v. Beumer Corporation Del. Ch.
  • 2018Basho Technologies Holdco B, LLC v. Georgetown Basho Investors, LLC Del. Ch.
  • 2018Ramsey v. Ga. S. Univ. Advanced Dev. Ctr. Del.
  • 2001FIRST UNION CORP. v. SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., 2001 NCBC 09 (Amended 08/10/01) N.C. Bus. Ct.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

In this Article, Professor Eisenberg examines how and why standards of conduct and standards of review diverge in corporate law. Professor Eisenberg analyzes the relevant standards of conduct and review that apply in a number of corporate law contexts. He discusses the reasoning and policies underlying these diverging standards. Professor Eisenberg explains the basis of most existing standards of conduct and review and suggests modifications of several others.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.