The Court and Overcriminalization

Michael Pierce, Stanford Law Review & The Stanford Law Review

Journal: Stanford Law Review

Volume: 68

Year: 2015

Bluebook Citation: 68 STAN. L. REV. (2015)

Author: Michael K. Pierce: all 4 publications


Abstract

Introduction In both Bond v. United States and Yates v. United States, the Supreme Court reversed federal criminal convictions. Neither defendant’s conduct was constitutionally protected; there were no procedural irregularities in either trial, no vagueness or overbreadth issues, and no police misconduct. Instead, each case involved prosecuting a small-time individual with a big-time statute: In […]

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.