The Constitutional Status of Marriage, Kinship, and Sexual Privacy -- Balancing the Individual and Social Interests
Hafen, Bruce C.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1996Peden v. State Kan.
- 1990Mancuso v. Dorsey, No. Cv89-0233398s (Mar. 5, 1990) Conn. Super. Ct.
- 1983Lehr v. Robertson U.S.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Today's lopsided competition between the individual and social interests has made the law a party to the contemporary haze that clouds our vision of what a family is or should be. In that sense, recent legal developments have contributed to the crisis Stanley Hauerwas has identified regarding American family life today - our inability to define "what kind of family should exist" and our inability to articulate ''why we should think of [the family] as our most basic moral institution." In response to those two questions, this Article considers whether, as a constitutional matter, the courts should recognize claims by unrelated individuals or groups who seek the same legal protection as that given to formal relationships based on legal marriage or kinship.