The Constitution and Contempt of Court
Goldfarb, Ronald
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Citations by decade
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by4
- 2024Nicholas Somberg v. Karen McDonald 6th Cir.
- 1996State v. Robinson Vt.
- 1967Peterson v. Peterson Minn.
- 1967Reamer v. Reamer Md.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Few legal devices find conflict within the lines of our Constitution with the ubiquity of the contempt power. These conflicts involve issues concerning the governmental power structure such as the separation of powers and the delicate balancing of federal-state relations. In addition, there are civil rights issues attributable to the conflict between the use of the contempt power and such vital procedural protections as the right to trial by jury, freedom from self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and indictment-to name only the most recurrent and controversial examples. Aside from these problems, there are other civil liberties issues, such as those involving freedom of speech, association, and religion, arising out of the exercise of the contempt power.
The purpose of this article is to present an extensive review of the constitutional problems provoked by the use of the contempt power by American courts.