The Congressional Invitation to Avoid the Preliminary Hearing: An Analysis of Section 303 of the Federal Magistrates Act of 1968

Weinberg, Patricia W. & Weinberg, Robert L.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 67

First Page: 1361

Year: 1969

Bluebook Citation: 67 MICH. L. REV. 1361 (1969)

Author: Robert L. Weinberg: all 3 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 1976State v. Florence Minn.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Under prior law, it is true, many federal prosecutors routinely avoided preliminary hearings by securing continuances of the hearing date until after an indictment was obtained. But this ploy required a complaisant magistrate or an inert defendant. Moreover, the propriety of using continuances to circumvent the accused's right to a preliminary hearing had come under increasing and sometimes successful attack. Section 303, if literally construed, can legitimize the prosecutorial practice of mooting the defendant's right to a preliminary hearing under rule 5(c) by obtaining a relatively quick indictment.

This predictable use or abuse of the Act should and can be prevented, we submit, either by a judicial construction of section 303 that preserves the defendant's right to a prompt preliminary hearing, or by provision for alternative forms of discovery that would reduce the prosecutor's motivation for avoiding the hearing.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.