The Comparative Law of Flag Desecration: The United States and the Federal Republic of Germany

Quint, Peter E.

Journal: UC Law SF International Law Review

Volume: 15

First Page: 613

Year: 1992

Bluebook Citation: 15 UC L. SF INT'L L. REV. 613 (1992)

Author: Peter E. Quint: all 16 publications


Abstract

Cases on political speech in different constitutional systems may illuminate important presuppositions of those systems. Pursuing this theme, this Article compares decisions on flag desecration in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany. In the United States, where protection aginst seditious libel has been rejected as a legitimate governmental interest, arguments for penalizing flag desecration must assert implausible governmental interests. In contrast, the German Constitutional Court frankly acknowledges that the state may sometimes penalize flag desecration to avoid the impairment of governmental authority.

In conclusion the author questions whether the German doctrine, which may have been justifiable in the early years of the Federal Republic, is appropriate under contemporary circumstances.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.