The “Commercial Offer for Sale” Standard After Minnesota Mining v. Chemque

Chiang, Campbell

Journal: Duke Law & Technology Review

Volume: 2

Year: 2003

Bluebook Citation: 2 DUKE L. & TECH. REV. (2003)

Author: Campbell Chiang: all 3 publications


Abstract

The Supreme Court established a two-part test for determining when an invention is "on sale" under 35 U.S.C. §102(b) in Pfaff v. Wells Electronics, Inc. For the on-sale bar to be triggered, the invention must be "ready for patenting" and subject of a "commercial offer for sale." In Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. Chemque, Inc., the Federal Circuit expounded on what constitutes a commercial offer for sale. This iBrief explores what is considered a "commercial offer for sale."

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.