THE CHURCH AND SPIEGEL CASES: A REINTERPRETATION OF THE "POSSESSION OR ENJOYMENT" CLAUSE OF I.R.C. 811 ©

Schrenk Jr., William J. & Wellman, Richard V.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 47

First Page: 655

Year: 1949

Bluebook Citation: 47 MICH. L. REV. 655 (1949)

Author: Richard V. Wellman: all 15 publications


Abstract

Although federal tax statutes have provided for over thirty years that "transfers intended to take effect in possession or enjoyment at or after death" shall be included in the grantor's gross estate for estate tax purposes attempts to define precisely the scope of this language have not been outstanding for their success. In two recent decisions by the Supreme Court, Commissioner v. Church and Spiegel v. Commissioner, a further attempt at clarification has been made.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.