The Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis Testimony to Prove Causation in Toxic Tort Cases: The Interplay of Adjective and Substantive Law
Sanders, Joseph & Machal-Fulks, Julie
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
2
Citing decisions
2
Courts citing
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by2
- 2004Easum v. Miller Wyo.
- 2004Carlson v. Okerstrom Neb.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
This article uses the differential diagnosis opinions to explore a pair of interrelationships. The basic causal framework employed by most courts in toxic tort cases is presented. A key to understanding the developing case law in this area is to appreciate the degree to which the courts have adopted the interpretive conventions of science in assessing admissibility.