Tenure, the Aberrant Consumer Contract

White, James J.

Journal: Chicago-Kent Law Review

Volume: 89

First Page: 353

Year: 2014

Bluebook Citation: 89 CHI.-KENT. L. REV. 353 (2014)

Author: James J. White: all 65 publications


Abstract

The tenure contract that prevails among the faculty at nearly all American colleges and universities is unusual, for the employee, who is normally the weaker, is favored by the contract over the employer, who is normally the stronger. The first part of the paper explains what tenure means and how it came about in the early twentieth century. The second part of the paper argues that the contract protects not only academic freedom but also bad teaching and weak scholarship. Finally the paper argues that the tenure contract should be abolished or restricted to minimize the inefficiencies that are now forced on colleges and universities by the contract in its unfettered form.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.