TAXATION-PROCEEDING BEFORE UNITED STATES BOARD OF TAX APPEALS -VALIDITY OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM - UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE

Thompson, Royal E.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 35

First Page: 510

Year: 1937

Bluebook Citation: 35 MICH. L. REV. 510 (1937)

Author: Royal E. Thompson: all 5 publications


Abstract

In a proceeding for judicial process to compel defendant to obey a subpoena duces tecum issued by the United States Board of Tax Appeals, defendant asserted that the documents called for were irrelevant to the issue involved, and that the subpoena was a violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. Held, a witness is not entitled to resist a subpoena for mere incompetency or irrelevancy. To question admissibility, the papers must be so manifestly irrelevant as to make it plain that it is a mere "fishing expedition." One paragraph of the subpoena was declared invalid, as lacking specification. United States v. Union Trust Co. of Pittsburgh, (D. C. Pa.

1936) 13 F .. Supp. 286.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.