TAXATION - MISTAKE OF FACT - RESTITUTION - SUBROGATION

Ulrich, Robert D.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 41

First Page: 1188

Year: 1943

Bluebook Citation: 41 MICH. L. REV. 1188 (1943)

Author: Robert D. Ulrich: all 5 publications


Abstract

Under the misapprehension of fact that he had an interest in the land, the plaintiff paid the taxes on land belonging to the defendant. The defendant did not know that the plaintiff intended to pay, nor did he promise, subsequent to payment, to reimburse the plaintiff. The action was brought to recover the amount of the payment, and for subrogation to the lien of the state for the taxes. The lower court denied relief; plaintiff appealed.

Held, affirmed. Federal Land Bank of Louisville v. Dorman (Ind. App. 1942) 41 N. E. (2d) 661.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.