Targeting Enemy Forces in the War on Terror: Preserving Civilian Immunity

Rosen, Richard D.

Journal: Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Volume: 42

First Page: 683

Year: 2009

Bluebook Citation: 42 VAND. J. TRANSNAT'L L. 683 (2009)

Author: Richard D. Rosen: all 5 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2011United States v. Hamdan U.S.C.M.R.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the interpretation given to it by many in the international community (e.g., UN, NGOs, media) provide perverse incentives to terrorist and insurgent groups to shield their military activities behind civilians and their property. In other words, the law governing targeting is fundamentally defective; it allows terrorist and insurgent groups to gain strategic and tactical advantages through their own noncompliance with the law and their adversaries' observance of it. The consequence has been increasing noncompliance with the law and growing civilian casualties. This Article proposes structural changes to the law governing targeting and attitudinal changes by those who interpret it to ensure that civilians receive adequate security from armed attack.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.