Taking (Equal Voting) Rights Seriously: The Fifteenth Amendment as Constitutional Foundation, and the Need for Judges to Remodel Their Approach to Age Discrimination in Political Rights

Amar, Vikram D.

Journal: Notre Dame Law Review

Volume: 97

First Page: 1619

Year: 2022

Bluebook Citation: 97 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1619 (2022)

Author: Vikram David Amar: all 40 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
  • 2026Trudy Grant v. Conway Belangia 4th Cir.

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

This Essay explores the relationship between twentieth-century voting-discrimination amendments and the Fifteenth Amendment’s antidiscrimination groundwork on which these later developments built. In particular, it examines ways in which the Twenty-Sixth Amendment, whose text and ratification conversations tightly track those of the Fifteenth Amendment, has been underimplemented, if not completely ignored, in recent debates and cases that are ever-more crucial to the meaning of political-rights equality under the Constitution. It ends by urging courts to take more seriously the similarities between the Twenty-Sixth and Fifteenth Amendments in adjudicating disputes involving facial or de facto age discrimination in political rights realms.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.