Susan Q. Wombwoman v. State of California

Weinstock, Laura

Journal: UC Law SF Journal on Gender and Justice

Volume: 2

First Page: 21

Year: 1990

Bluebook Citation: 2 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 21 (1990)

Author: Laura Weinstock: all 4 publications


Abstract

The following opinion reflects my dissatisfaction with current equal protection and privacy doctrine analysis, especially in the area of reproduction. Although this particular fact pattern was created for the classroom, it is far from "hypothetical." Women's reproductive rights are being increasingly curtailed in the name of fetal rights. Indeed, fetal rights legislation has resulted in such intrusive control over women's lives that one cannot help but wonder whether this control over women via their reproductive abilities is the masked intention of the proponents of these laws. How much better off the world would be if the Supreme Court produced opinions such as the one that follows.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.