SUBSTANCE AND PROCEDURE IN THE CONFLICT OF LAWS
Ailes, Edgar H.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1
- 1970Horvath v. Davidson Ind. App.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
It is perhaps the most inveterate doctrine of the conflict of laws that all questions of procedure in a given instance are governed by the lex fori, or the law of the court invoked, regardless of the law under which the substantive rights of the parties accrued. For seven centuries, at least, courts and lawyers have broadly stated or assumed to be axiomatic the rule that substantive rights are fixed and immutable whilst the procedural devices by which such rights may be vindicated and enforced depend solely upon the law of the forum.