State Taxation Under the Commerce Clause: An Historical Perspective
Hellerstein, Jerome R.
Citation analytics
How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.
Courts citing this journal article
Most recently cited by3
- 1979Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles U.S.
- 1978Department of Revenue v. Ass'n of Washington Stevedoring Companies U.S.
- 1978Mobil Oil Corp. v. Commissioner of Taxes Vt.
Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.
Abstract
Although Congress has plenary power under the commerce clause to regulate state taxation of interstate commerce, that power remained virtually unexercised until 1959. As a consequence of the silence of Congress, the task of reconciling the competing interests of states, multistate businesses, and local businesses, and accommodating those interests to the needs of a national economy fell by default to the Supreme Court. The instrumentality available to the Court for dealing with the complex political, fiscal, and economic controversies inherent in state taxation of multistate business was the commerce clause (augmented by due process restrictions and,to a lesser extent, the equal protection clause).