STATE REGULATION OF INTERSTATE MOTOR CARRIERS

Kauper, Paul G.

Journal: Michigan Law Review

Volume: 31

First Page: 920

Year: 1933

Bluebook Citation: 31 MICH. L. REV. 920 (1933)

Author: Paul G. Kauper: all 61 publications


Citation analytics

How this journal article sits in the citation network, derived from CiteLaw's graph of published opinions.

Cited
1
Citing decision
1
Courts citing
Most recently cited by1

Counts reflect decisions in the CiteLaw corpus and may lag very recent opinions.


Abstract

According to Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution, "The Congress shall have power . . . to regulate commerce . . . among the several States . . . . " Is this provision of the Constitution applicable to interstate motor transportation over a public highway, built, owned, and maintained by a State? The provincial view might have been put forward that because the State owns the highways, therefore it should have exclusive control with respect to the commerce passing over them. Whatever force might have been conceded such a view in the early history of our country, when inland transportation had not assumed great proportions, it was dispelled after the Civil War when the Supreme Court recognized restraints upon the power of the States to regulate interstate rail carriers.

Railroads were in a sense considered public highways, since railroad corporations with their various franchises and powers were the special creations of the States. But that fact did not operate to remove interstate commerce by rail from the operation of the commerce clause, or militate against the power of Congress to regulate interstate rail transportation.

Chat with this journal article using AI

Ask CiteLaw's AI Navigator anything about this journal article, verify citations, and research related authorities. Sign up for CiteLaw free today to get started.